squiddan24 squiddan24
  • 22-09-2020
  • History
contestada

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians

Respuesta :

chickenbutt787
chickenbutt787 chickenbutt787
  • 22-09-2020

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

Answer Link
1047654
1047654 1047654
  • 26-08-2021

Answer:

the answer is D.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

13. Sound waves can't travel through A. a solid. B. a liquid. C. an elastic material. D. a vacuum.
what is nationalism
Summarize the way plants store extra sugar
Short Essay On Rainy Season In India
How do you multiply 5/12 times 2/9?
Argue your support for the North to include accurate details about causes and effects of the war and your reasons for fighting for the Union. Describe how the o
1. (k+7)² =2892. (2s-1)² =2253. (x-4)² =169please help me answer these :)
Solve this.. ➕+ ➕ + ➕+ ➕=30 Fill the boxes using (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15) U can also repeat the numbers..
what are the different types of gorilla?
what is the difference between a moth and a butterfly?